Real estate transactions are a significant financial investment, and both buyers and sellers enter into contracts with the expectation that the agreed terms will be honored. However, sometimes one party may fail to meet their obligations, which is known as a breach of contract. When this happens in Maryland, it can lead to serious consequences for both parties involved. If you find yourself in this situation, it is important to understand the legal remedies that are available to help resolve the breach and protect your rights. Maryland law offers several options for individuals who have been affected by a breach of a real estate contract, and these remedies aim to either compensate for the loss or enforce the original terms of the agreement. At, Hartman, Attorneys At Law, we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.
Understanding a Real Estate Contract
Before diving into the remedies, it is helpful to understand what a real estate contract typically involves. In Maryland, real estate contracts are legally binding agreements between a buyer and a seller that outline the terms of the sale of a property. These contracts will generally specify details like the purchase price, financing arrangements, deadlines for inspections, and the closing date. Each party has certain obligations they must fulfill, such as the buyer’s responsibility to secure financing or the seller’s obligation to provide a clear title to the property.
When one party fails to fulfill their obligations as set out in the contract, a breach occurs. This can happen for a variety of reasons. A buyer might be unable to secure the necessary funds to complete the purchase, or a seller might fail to address issues discovered during a home inspection. Regardless of the reason, the law provides several ways to address the breach and ensure that the harmed party receives fair treatment.
Types of Breaches in Real Estate Contracts
Not all breaches of contract are the same, and the remedies available can depend on whether the breach is considered material or minor. A material breach occurs when one party fails to perform a key element of the contract that causes the entire agreement to break down. For example, if a buyer fails to provide the purchase funds by the closing date, this would be considered a material breach because it prevents the sale from moving forward.
On the other hand, a minor breach occurs when one party fails to fulfill a less significant obligation, but the overall transaction can still be completed. For instance, if a seller does not repair a minor defect in the property as required but the buyer is still able to purchase the home, this would likely be considered a minor breach. In cases of a minor breach, the non-breaching party might still be entitled to some form of compensation, but the breach may not be significant enough to cancel the entire contract.
Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract in Maryland
Maryland law provides several remedies when a breach of a real estate contract occurs. These remedies are designed to either put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred or to compensate them for the losses they have suffered. The most common remedies include compensatory damages, specific performance, and contract rescission.
I had a case a year ago dealing with some crazy girl. The judge threw it out. I forgot to rate Mr.Hartman so I’m doing it now.. I would recommend this lawyer.
- Marcus, Client
Ed Hartman has an excellent reputation in the legal community. He is a hard worker and a family man.
- Attorney Peer Review
Compensatory Damages
One of the most common remedies for a breach of contract in a real estate transaction is compensatory damages. This involves the breaching party paying the non-breaching party a monetary sum that reflects the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the breach. For instance, if a buyer backs out of the deal at the last minute, the seller might incur costs related to relisting the property or delaying their own plans. In such a case, the seller could seek compensatory damages to cover these expenses.
It is important to note that compensatory damages are meant to cover the actual losses suffered by the non-breaching party. They are not intended to punish the breaching party but rather to make the non-breaching party whole again by compensating them for the financial harm they have endured. The amount of damages awarded will depend on the specific facts of the case and the extent of the losses.
Specific Performance
Another common remedy in real estate contract breaches is specific performance. This remedy is unique to real estate transactions because each piece of property is considered to have its own unique value. If the buyer breaches the contract, the seller may request that the court order the buyer to follow through with the purchase as originally agreed. This is known as specific performance, and it forces the breaching party to perform their obligations under the contract rather than simply paying damages.
Specific performance is most often sought by sellers when the buyer breaches the contract, but it can also be pursued by buyers if the seller refuses to complete the sale. The reasoning behind this remedy is that monetary damages might not be sufficient to make up for the loss of a particular piece of property, especially if the property is unique or has significant personal value. However, specific performance is not always granted, as the court will only issue this remedy when it is feasible for both parties to fulfill the contract terms.
Contract Rescission
In some cases, the non-breaching party may decide that they no longer want to move forward with the transaction. In this situation, they can seek to have the contract rescinded. Contract rescission effectively cancels the contract and returns both parties to their original positions before the agreement was made. For instance, if a buyer breaches the contract and the seller no longer wishes to sell the property, the seller can ask the court to rescind the contract, meaning that they are no longer obligated to complete the sale.
Rescission is often pursued when the breach is so severe that it would be unfair to require the non-breaching party to continue with the transaction. However, once a contract is rescinded, neither party can enforce any of the terms, and the transaction is considered void.
Liquidated Damages
Many real estate contracts in Maryland include a provision for liquidated damages. This is an agreed-upon amount of money that the breaching party will pay if they fail to fulfill their obligations. For instance, a buyer might put down a deposit, known as earnest money, when they enter into a contract to purchase a home. If the buyer breaches the contract, the seller may be entitled to keep the deposit as liquidated damages.
Liquidated damages provide a clear and predetermined amount of compensation for the non-breaching party, which can simplify the process of resolving the breach. However, in order for liquidated damages to be enforceable, the amount must be reasonable and reflect a fair estimate of the losses that might result from a breach. Courts in Maryland will not enforce liquidated damages clauses if the amount is considered excessive or punitive.
Mitigation of Damages
In Maryland, the non-breaching party has a duty to mitigate their damages after a breach of contract occurs. This means that they must take reasonable steps to reduce the financial harm they suffer as a result of the breach. For example, if a buyer breaches a real estate contract, the seller cannot simply allow the property to sit unsold for an extended period of time in order to increase their damages. Instead, they must take action to relist the property and attempt to find a new buyer as soon as possible.
The requirement to mitigate damages ensures that the non-breaching party does not receive an unfair windfall as a result of the breach. It also encourages both parties to act in good faith and take reasonable steps to resolve the issue as quickly and fairly as possible.
A breach of a real estate contract in Maryland can have serious consequences, but the law provides several remedies to address these situations. Whether through compensatory damages, specific performance, or contract rescission, the goal of the legal system is to ensure that the non-breaching party is made whole and that the terms of the contract are enforced fairly. Each remedy serves a specific purpose, depending on the nature and extent of the breach, and individuals involved in real estate transactions should be aware of their options in the event of a breach.
If you are facing a breach of a real estate contract in Maryland and need guidance on your legal options, the experienced team at Hartman, Attorneys At Law can help. Our knowledgeable attorneys will work closely with you to determine the best course of action and protect your interests. Contact Hartman, Attorneys At Law today to schedule a consultation and get the support you need.